Financial

BusinessWeek Florida’s Big Insurance Problem

No Comments
November 13  |  Financial, Florida, News  |   admin

Thursday November 13, 8:08 am ET

By Nanette Byrnes

When Hurricane Ike took a left on Sept. 8, heading away from Florida, locals breathed a sigh of relief. Not only are their homes on the line with each burst of violent weather but their pocketbooks are increasingly at risk, too. Over the past four years, Florida taxpayers’ vulnerability to a major weather catastrophe has grown.

The quasi-governmental company that was conceived as an insurer of last resort, Citizens Property Insurance, has become Florida’s top underwriter of homeowners’ insurance. Citizens now has more than $433 billion of property exposure on its books, and Florida has exacerbated that risk by getting into the reinsurance business as well. “It’s a disaster,” says Brian P. Sullivan, editor of Property Insurance Report. “This is not something the public should be dabbling with.”

Florida’s concentration of risk in the hands of taxpayers is an example of the potential risks of having states supplement private-sector insurance. While Florida is particularly exposed to hurricanes, states including Texas and Louisiana also have increasingly popular state-sponsored insurance funds. And there’s talk in Washington of adding wind coverage to the federal flood insurance program. The appeal for homeowners: reasonably priced policies that offer relief from rising rates. But critics say that, in Florida at least, the state-sponsored player has inadequate reserves to cover future losses if a big storm hits, and that private companies find it tough to compete. “If the market behaved more rationally, prices would likely go up,” says Ross Buchmueller, chief executive of PURE Risk Management, which writes only high-end homeowners’ insurance in Florida.

On the surface, Citizens looks like an attractive option. The insurer is projecting a $4 billion surplus at the end of this year, says spokesman John Kuczwanski. But risk modelers project a rise in hurricanes, which could lead to heavy losses. According to the pro-industry Florida Insurance Council, if a category 4 or 5 storm hit Miami, it could cost $50 billion in repairs. Hurricane Katrina cost insurers $44.9 billion nationwide, according to insurance credit-rating agency A.M. Best.

Insurers typically try to spread the risk of such major calamities by buying reinsurance. Florida has instead taken on $28 billion worth of reinsurance risk itself, and its reinsurance pool would have to issue bonds for anything over $7.8 billion in losses. (The state’s entire 2007-08 budget is $70 billion.) Given the credit market’s volatility, taxpayers could face a huge bill. In July the state agreed to pay $224 million to Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK-A – News) just for the right to borrow $4 billion if insurance fund losses exceed $16 billion before May 15, 2009.

Citizens was never meant to grow to this size. It now has 1 million policies in force and accounts for 28% of all written premiums for homeowners’ insurance — more than double its nearest rival, State Farm Insurance. Formed as a backstop in 2002, the company took off after three major hurricanes in 2004 and 2005.

Faced with state-imposed limits on raising rates to cover their risks, insurers began to pull out of Florida. Allstate Insurance (NYSE:ALL – News) has reduced its presence by two thirds since 2004, writing 500,000 fewer homeowners’ policies. State Farm, meanwhile, is appealing for a 47% rate increase and stopped writing new policies in Florida in February. Earlier this year it also canceled coverage on all homes within a mile of the coastline. “We are very concerned about the financial condition of State Farm Florida,” says spokesman Chris Neal. “Even in nonhurricane years, we have continued to lose money.”

As Citizens grows, how much liability could taxpayers face? With foreclosures rising and reconstruction costs high, it seems that Florida’s next big hurricane could leave a wake of financial destruction.

A.M. Best Releases Video on Startup Insurance Company Ratings

No Comments
March 31  |  A.M. Best, Financial, News  |   admin

Business Editors

OLDWICK, N.J.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–March 31, 2009–A.M. Best Co. has released an online video interview explaining how and why start-up insurance and reinsurance companies receive a rating.

Does A.M. Best assign ratings to start-up companies; the simple answer is yes.

“There is a common misconception in the marketplace in certain jurisdictions and states that A.M. Best does not rate start-ups,” says Anthony Diodato, group vice president. “That goes back decades ago when there was a requirement that a company needed representative operating experience. Since the mid-90s’ that requirement no longer exists and A.M. Best will assign a rating to any company willing to interact and share information with us.

“A.M. Best feels it’s important to get out our opinion to the marketplace,” continues Mr. Diodato. “If it’s to a homeowner buying a policy, someone buying an auto policy, a risk manager or small business owner who is putting their faith in an insurance company, we feel it’s important to give our opinion from an independent source on the ability of that insurance company to meet its obligation to pay those claims.”

In addition, companies have interacted with A.M. Best to obtain a rating; however, the rating has not been made public. “Our position for initial ratings is if the company chooses not to accept the rating, it remains confidential,” says Stefan Holzberger, assistant vice president. “So what the market in many cases doesn’t see is how many management teams come to A.M. Best with a business plan that does not quite generate the rating they want or they need. And, as a result, those ratings do not become published interactive financial strength ratings.”

To learn more about the how and why of rating start-up companies, please view the video interview at http://www.ambest.com/multimedia/StartupRatings.html. A full written transcript of the video is also available on the same Web page.

Also, please access the rating methodologies referenced in the video, “Frequently Asked Questions: Rating Start-Up Reinsurers,” and “Rating New Company Formations.”

A.M. Best Upgrades Issuer Credit Ratings and Revises Outlook of American Capital Assurance Group and Its Members

No Comments
March 15  |  A.M. Best, ACA, Financial, News  |   admin

A.M. Best Co. has upgraded the issuer credit ratings (ICR) to “bbb+” from “bbb”, revised the outlook to positive from stable and affirmed the financial strength rating (FSR) of B++ (Good) of American Capital Assurance Group (ACA) (St. Petersburg, FL) and its members. (See below for a detailed listing of the companies.) The ratings reflect ACA’s profitable underwriting performance in the Florida small commercial and homeowners markets, as well as its solid risk-adjusted capitalization resulting from prudent underwriting, a tempered direct premiums written trend in recent years and a sound overall risk management focus. As a result, surplus growth has occurred in recent years, complemented by support from ACA’s parent company.

The positive outlook contemplates that operating performance and risk-adjusted capitalization will continue to trend favorably in the near and long term. These positive rating factors are somewhat offset by ACA’s limited product offerings and current geographic concentration of risk in Florida, with subsequent exposure to weather-related events and significant dependence on reinsurance. In order to mitigate this concern, the group continues to maintain conservative catastrophe reinsurance coverage.

The ICRs have been upgraded to “bbb+” from “bbb” and the FSR of B++ (Good) has been affirmed for American Capital Assurance Group and its following members:

– American Capital Assurance Corporation

– ACA Home Insurance Corp.

For Best’s Credit Ratings, an overview of the rating process and rating methodologies, please visit http://www.ambest.com/ratings.

The principal methodologies used in determining these ratings, including any additional methodologies and factors that may have been considered, can be found at http://www.ambest.com/ratings/methodology.

Guide to Best’s Financial Strength Ratings

No Comments
January 16  |  Financial, News  |   admin

Download Guide to Best’s Financial Strength Ratings

A.M. Best Booklet Information

No Comments
January 16  |  A.M. Best, Financial, News  |   admin

A.M. BEST COMPANY

CERTIFIED BY NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED STATISCAL RATING ORGANIZATION (NRSRO)

Oldwick, New Jersey London, England Hong Kong, China

Why is a Best’s Rating Important?

For insurance companies, a Best’s Rating is a strategic tool that can enhance consumer confidence in the organization’s stability, as well as its attractiveness to investors. A rating also enhances an insurer’s credibility with reinsurers; a valuable resource, particularly for insurers entering new markets.

Insurance professionals depend on Best’s Ratings to determine the financial strength and operation of specific insurers, to evaluate prospective reinsurance accounts, to compare company performance and financial condition, and more. A Best’s Rating can influence an agent’s selection of plans to market.

In recent years, ratings also have become an increasingly important factor in consumers’ decisions to purchase insurance. Today’s insurance consumers are well aware of how regional, political and economic instabilities can affect a marginal company. Best’s Ratings provide these consumers with the information necessary for an educated buying decision. In October of 1999, A.M. Best announced that it was offering company ratings and insurer profiles on its corporate Web site free of charge.

A.M. Best Company is committed to maintaining Best’s Ratings as the definitive source for information on the financial condition and operating performance of insurance companies worldwide.

All queries regarding the use of proprietary information or to obtain a licensing agreement or a letter of consent should be directed to:

A.M. Best Company

Office of Intellectual Property

Ambest Road

Oldwick, New Jersey 08858

Phone: 908-439-2200, extension 5644 or email james.peavy@ambest.com

The History of A.M. Best Company

A.M. Best Company, founded in 1899 by Alfred M. Best, has grown steadily over the last century and continues to expand into the new millennium. Since its inception, the company has earned a reputation as The Insurance Information Source®.

A.M. Best Co.was founded with the purpose of performing a constructive and objective role in the insurance industry toward the prevention and detection of insurer insolvency.” This mission led to the development of Best’s Ratings, which are now recognized worldwide as the benchmark for assessing insurers’ financial strength.

Best’s rating opinions reflect an in-depth understanding of business fundamentals garnered from more than 100 years of focusing solely on the insurance industry. This is one reason why insurance industry professionals have consistently ranked Best’s Ratings number one in confidence, usefulness and understanding.

Rapid growth soon necessitated another move in 1974 — this time to the company’s present global headquarters in Oldwick, NJ. With a new wing constructed in 2000, the company doubled in size.

To address the increasing globalization of the insurance industry, A.M. Best expanded into a worldwide operation and established A.M. Best Europe Ltd. in London in 1997 and A.M. Best Asia-Pacific in Hong Kong in 2000.

What started out as financial reporting in the early 1900s has grown to more than 50 publications and services that meet the diverse demands of the ever-changing insurance industry. Today, more than 400 analysts, statisticians and editorial personnel are dedicated to providing the insurance industry with the most complete, accurate and up-to-date financial and operating information.

A.M. Best’s publications and services are produced on a variety of timetables to meet the needs of those who require details on every aspect of the complex insurance field. Statistical background for the publications comes from A.M. Best’s database, the most comprehensive source of insurance company financial and operating figures available. Products are obtainable as printed publications, on CD-ROM and online.

In this ever-changing industry, one thing remains the same — A.M. Best’s commitment to providing timely, accurate and complete insurance information and services that meet the needs of this dynamic industry.

What is a Best’s Rating?

A Best’s Rating is an independent third-party evaluation that subjects all insurers to the same rigorous criteria, providing a valuable benchmark for comparing insurers, regardless of their country of domicile. Such a benchmark is increasingly important to an international market that looks for a strong indication of stability in the face of widespread deregulation, mergers, acquisitions and other dynamic factors.

A.M. Best assigns three types of ratings. All are independent opinions, based on a comprehensive quantitative and qualitative evaluation, of a company’s balance sheet strength, operating performance and business profile. They are not a warranty of a company’s financial strength and ability to meet either its obligations to policyholders or its financial obligations (view complete notice).

  • Best’s Financial Strength Ratings provide an opinion of an insurer’s financial strength and ability to meet ongoing obligations to policyholders.
  • Best’s Issuer Credit Ratings provide an opinion of an entity’s ability to meet its senior obligations.
  • Best’s Debt Ratings provide an opinion for the credit marketplace as to the issuer’s ability to meet its financial obligations to security holders when due.

Our analytical process incorporates a host of quantitative and qualitative measures, including comparisons to peers and industry standards as well as assessments of an insurer’s operating plans, philosophy and management. A complete list of Best’s Rating Methodologies is available and continually fine tuned to reflect ever-changing industry, regulatory and legal developments, as well as changes in underlying business fundamentals

Financial Strength Ratings

A Best’s Financial Strength Rating (FSR) is an opinion of an insurer’s ability to meet its obligations to policyholders. Rating Modifiers and Affiliation Codes may also be associated with these ratings. The following list outlines our rating scale and associated descriptions.

Secure Vulnerable

A++, A+ (Superior) B, B- (Fair)

A, A- (Excellent) C++, C+ (Marginal)

B++, B+ (Good) C, C- (Weak)

D (Poor)

E (Under Regulatory Supervision)

F (In Liquidation)

S (Rating Suspended)

Not Rated Categories (NR) are assigned to companies reported on by A.M. Best, but not assigned a Best’s Rating. The five categories and descriptions are listed below.

NR-1: Insufficient Data

NR-2: Insufficient Size and/or Operating Experience

NR-3: Rating Procedure Inapplicable

NR-4: Company Request

NR-5: Not Formally Followed

Rating Modifiers and Affiliation Codes

A rating modifier can be assigned to indicate that a Best’s Rating may be subject to near term change (under review), that a company did not subscribe to Best’s interactive rating process (public data) and that the rating is assigned to a syndicate operating at Lloyd’s.

Affiliation codes (g, p, and r) are added to Best’s Ratings to identify companies whose assigned ratings are based on group, pooling or reinsurance affiliation with other insurers.

Rating Modifiers Affiliation Codes

u – Under Review g – Group

s – Syndicate p – Pooled

pd – Public Data r – Reinsured

Rating Outlook

Best’s interactive Ratings (A++ to D) are assigned a Rating Outlook that indicates the potential direction of a company’s rating for an intermediate period, generally defined as the next 12 to 36 months.

Financial Size Categories (FSC)

To enhance the usefulness of our ratings, A.M. Best assigns each letter rated (A++ through D) insurance company a Financial Size Category (FSC). The FSC is designed to provide a convenient indicator of the size of a company in terms of its statutory surplus and related accounts.

Many insurance buyers only want to consider buying insurance coverage from companies that they believe have sufficient financial capacity to provide the necessary policy limits to insure their risks. Although companies utilize reinsurance to reduce their net retention on the policy limits they underwrite, many buyers still feel more comfortable buying from companies perceived to have greater financial capacity.

FSC

Adjusted

Policyholders’ Surplus

FSC

Adjusted

Policyholders’ Surplus

I Less than 1 IX 250 to 500

II 1 to 2 X 500 to 750

III 2 to 5 XI 750 to 1,000

IV 5 to 10 XII 1,000 to 1,250

V 10 to 25 XIII 1,250 to 1,500

VI 25 to 50 XIV 1,500 to 2,000

VII 50 to 100 XV 2,000 or greater

VIII 100 to 250

Note: Ranges are in millions of U.S. dollars

Usage of Best’s Ratings

Best’s Ratings are proprietary and may not be reproduced without permission from A.M. Best. Companies assigned a Best’s Rating should review our ‘Guide to Proper Use’ which outlines the proper use of A.M. Best’s proprietary information, specifically Best’s Ratings, AMB Credit Reports – Insurance Professional and Best’s Security Icon.

What Has Been the Industry Trend Regarding Insurer Ratings

No Comments
January 16  |  Financial, News  |   admin

There is no doubt the propensity over the last five to six for the dominant rating agency of the U.S. insurance industry, A.M. Best, is to downgrade property-liability insurers.

This could reflect a general deteriorating credit worthiness of the industry in general or an overall increase in the performance threshold’s Best’s has deemed necessary to achieve a given rating classification. Consistent with a recent study of corporate bond ratings, there is evidence of an increase in rating stringency. There appears to be pressure for insurers to maintain their existing ratings which provides a plausible explanation of the dramatic buildup of capital in the industry during the 1990’s. In addition, trends suggest Best’s raised the bar in terms of capital required to maintain the highest ratings differential relative to the increase in standards they required for lower rated categories. The actual pattern of capital buildup across firms in different rating categories is consistent with an attempt by the high quality firms to defend these ratings.

What Do Consumers Value?

Consumers, overwhelmingly, value insurers with strong financial ratings. The size of companies and scope of their activities was less important than their consistently strong balance sheet and income statement. Having their performance validated by independent third-party rating organization provided additional peace of mind.

Insurance Company Financial Stability Ratings – Important?

No Comments
January 16  |  Financial, News  |   admin

The financial strength of an insurer is often the most critical component of your financial future.

To operate effectively in today’s insurance marketplace, strong and stable financial strength ratings are widely regarded as a necessity. There are many recognized rating agencies, such as A.M. Best and Standard & Poors, just to name a few.

Over 100 Years Experience and Expertise Rating Insurance Companies:

For many years, A.M. Best was the sole source of this type of analysis. Since the early 1980’s, a handful of additional firms have joined the property-casualty insurer rating and financial analysis industry. Risk Managers and insurance professionals view these agencies as complementary; banks view them as necessary and usually require a certain letter rating to satisfy loan requirements.

2004 / 2005 Hurricane Seasons

Following the most active hurricane seasons in Florida’s history there has been a lot of attention devoted to the issue of insurer insolvency. Insurer evaluation organizations have become a hot commodity. New rating organizations have appeared on the market, and well established rating companies have modified their methodology to reflect differences in financial conditions. New products have been developed providing access to specific insurer information.

Suffice it to say, analyzing insurers’ overall performance and financial strength is a task that requires specialized skills.

Do You Understand Financial Ratings?

No Comments
January 16  |  Financial, News  |   admin

Understanding insurer financial ratings and the actual methodology used in arriving at ratings is very involved and complex. Various companies have different philosophies and approaches to arriving at their specific ratings, however, some commonalties do exist.

There are general quantitative and qualitative factors that are considered in assigning insurer ratings.

Some of the quantitative factors are:

Profitability

  • Combined Ratio
  • Return on Assets
  • Loss Ratio

Investments

  • Quality
  • Diversification

Leverage
Liquidity
Risk-based Capitalization

Some of the qualitative factors are:

  • Parent Affiliation
  • Competitive Position
  • Product
  • Geographical Diversification
  • Adequacy of Reserves
  • Management Philosophy
  • Stability of Performance
  • Market Conditions

Recognized rating organizations include A.M. Best, Weiss, Demotech, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s.

It is difficult to evaluate the information provided by these organizations and if you do not understand it, you should consult with your insurance agent or the applicable rating organization, regarding their specific rating methodology.

Demotech CEO Meeting with Florida Policymakers on Cat Fund Dilemma

No Comments
January 15  |  Financial, Florida, News  |   admin

01/15/2009

Demotech CEO Joe Petrelli is in Tallahassee today and Friday for meetings with state policymakers and staff, including Florida Insurance Council representatives, on the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund shortfall.

Many FIC members received a letter from Demotech in November warning that absent a Cat Fund financing solution, they will be required to demonstrate adequate alternative financing to maintain their Demotech Financial Stability Rating after May 15.

“CEO Joe Petrelli will be visiting many key policymakers to discuss the letter and to bring some ideas to assist the state with the Cat Fund shortfall,” Lisa Miller, consultant for Demotech, said this morning. “Demotech is doing everything it can to work with regulators and state policymakers toward solutions in the marketplace. The purpose of the visits the next two days to start a dialog on ways to work together so that the Legislature will have as much information as possible when it deliberates the Cat Fund.”

Jack Nicholson, Cat Fund CEO, told the Senate Banking & Insurance Committee Wednesday the program “is way short” of financing even the mandatory layer, which would be about $17 billion for the 2009 hurricane season. There seems to be agreement among most following this issue that it is impossible, for all practical purposes, to finance TICL, which would be another $13 billion for 2009, unless Congress quickly establishes a National Catastrophe Fund.

“Since the fall of 1996, Demotech, Inc., has reviewed and assigned Financial Stability Ratings to virtually all of the start-up Property and Casualty insurance companies writing property insurance in the State of Florida,” Demotech wrote in the letter to insurers.

“…The potential inability of the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund to honor meritorious claims related to a significant event adversely influences the Financial Stability Rating of each of the carriers that are heavily dependent on the reinsurance provided by the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe fund. Under current circumstances and conditions, we will provide, monitor and support Financial Stability Ratings through the period ending May 15, 2009. An extension of financial Stability Ratings beyond May 15, 2009, will require definitive financial information regarding participation in the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund, documentation of bridge loans or alternative financing mechanisms that provide liquidity during a period in which the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund would be raising capital and other precaution or protection regarding reinsurance collectability or catastrophe reinsurance.”

Florida Today New insurers in state for less

No Comments
December 23  |  A.M. Best, Financial, News  |   admin

New insurers in state for less

BY MATT REED, FLORIDA TODAY • December 23, 2008

If you want to pay less for hurricane insurance, it’s time for you to act. You, the consumer. Not the governor or the Legislature or the media. You.

What to do:

• Shop around. Grab the phone book and call for a quote from an independent agent, not one of the big brand names. Independent agents sell policies from a host of new arrivals including Universal, Security First, St. Johns, Cypress, Edison and Olympus.

You can go to FloridaHomeInsurers.com to get quotes. You won’t find the insurers themselves listed in the phone book, so you have to call anagent.

• Get your discounts. No, you didn’t automatically qualify for them when you described your home to your agent. You have to get an inspection, which can be free, and send a separate form to your insurer.

You can save hundreds per year based on the shape of your roof and materials used to build your home — stuff you don’t have to change. To get started, call your company or go online to MySafeFloridaHome.com.

• Check your replacement values. On your policy, they’re the dollar amounts listed for your dwelling, personal property “and other structures.” If they’re too high, you’re paying too much.

One way to know: If your dwelling value looks like market prices in your neighborhood, it’s too high. When you rebuild, you don’t have to pay again for the land, utilities, impact fees or sales commissions.

Get honest info

But will you get honest information when you shop for hurricane insurance? Readers have relayed some lulus from agents:

• The new insurers competing in Florida aren’t rated and don’t have money to pay claims.

• Your home’s “contents” coverage is dictated by the state and you can’t change it.

• You have to buy hurricane coverage with your policy, even if you own your home outright.

I ran those statements past the state Office of Insurance Regulation, which described them as “unfair” or “false.”

Tom Zutell, deputy communications director, said the host of new property insurers – which have offered lower prices and picked up thousands of former Allstate, State Farm and Nationwide customers — comply with “the most rigorous standards in the nation” for ensuring that companies can pay claims after a catastrophe.

“We have an entire division of employees who do nothing but monitor companies’ solvency and keep a constant eye out for any indication a company may be experiencing financial difficulty,” Zutell said.

Some companies are so new, they do not yet have ratings from commercial agencies, he said. But consumers can check ratings for free at Demotech.com or AMBest.com.

I checked Demotech Inc. ratings for four relatively new arrivals — St. Johns, Security First, Royal Palm and Universal Property & Casualty. All had “A” or “Excellent” ratings .

Understand ratings

But understand that Demotech ratings differ from ratings by other companies such as A.M. Best and Moody’s.

Those services measure a broader range of factors that can include depth of reserves, company age, profitability and diversification across regions and lines of insurance. If you can get an affordable policy with an “A+” rating from A.M. Best, take it.

But new Florida-based companies that specialize in homeowners’ insurance and rely on backup “reinsurance” to pay hurricane claims stand little chance with the agency.

Demotech focuses primarily on a company’s ability to remain solvent and pay claims in a crisis.

And remember, no rating predicts how quickly an insurer — big or small — will send an adjuster to accurately pay you.

Page 1 of 212